Brand: XP 820 ® Insecticide Ear-Tag
ACTIVE INGREDIENT(S) & WEIGHT
- abamectin: 8%
- piperonyl butoxide: 20%
- tag weight: 9 g
CHEMICAL CLASS of the active ingredient(s):
INDICATIONS: CATTLE (beef & lactating dairy cows)
PARASITES CONTROLLED (spectrum of activity)
- Horn flies (Haematobia irritans).
- Gulf Coast Ticks (Amblyomma maculatum) & Spinose Ear Ticks (Otobius megnini).
- Aids in the control of face flies (Musca autumnalis), American Dog Ticks (Dermacentor variabilis), Cattle Fever Ticks (Boophilus spp), Lone Star Ticks (Amblyomma americanum).
- Horn Flies:
- 1 tag/animal for up to 3 months control.
- 2 tags/animal for up to 5 months control (1 tag on each ear).
- For breeds with large ears, apply to back of ear for optimum control of horn flies.
- Gulf Coast Ticks: 2 tags/animal for up to 4 months control (1 tag on each ear).
- Spinose Ear Ticks: 2 tags/animal (1 tag on the front of each ear).
- American Dog Ticks: 2 tags/animal (1 tag per ear) to aid in control for up to 3 months.
- Cattle Fever Ticks (Boophilus species): 2 tags/animal (1 tag per ear) to aid in control for 2 to 3 months.
- Lone Star Ticks: 2 tags/animal (1 tag per ear) to aid in control for 2 months.
- Face Flies (Musca autumnalis): 2 tags/animal (1 tag on the front of each ear) to reduce Face Flies.
- All animals in the herd should be tagged.
- Remove tags in fall.
- LD50 (acute oral) in rats: 225.4 mg/kg (for the tag, according to MSDS)
- LD50 (acute dermal) in rats: >5000 mg/kg (for the tag, according to MSDS)
Suspected poisoning? Read the article on abamectin safety in this site.
Withholding periods (=withdrawal times) in days for meat & milk (country-specific differences may apply: read the product label)
- Meat: NIL.
- Milk for human consumption: Do not tag lactating dairy cows.
You may be interested in the following articles in this site dealing with the general safety of veterinary products:
- Safety for humans
- Safety for domestic animals
- Safety for the environment
- Hazard classifications of pesticides
Risk of resistance? So far there are no report on resistance of horn flies to abamectin or other macrocyclic lactones. But it must be assumed that prolonged uninterrupted exposure to macrocyclic lactones would sooner or later lead to resistance development. Resistance of horn flies (Haematobia irritans irritans) to synthetic pyrethroids is widespread worldwide, and can be very high, regardless of the delivery form (ear-tag, pour-on, spraying, dust bags, etc.). There are also reports on horn fly resistance to organophosphates, but it is less frequent ands stronger than to synthetic pyrethroids.
The synergist in the formulation (PBO) is supposed to neutralize resistance of parasites to pesticides due to so-called metabolic resistance (enhanced detoxification) caused by mixed function oxidases (= MFO), which is one among several mechanisms by which parasites can become resistant to pesticides of many chemical classes. PBO specifically inhibits the activity of MFOs. If metabolic resistance is caused by other enzymes than MFOs, or if resistance is (also) due to other mechanisms such as target site insensitivity, reduced penetration or behavioral modifications, it won't be neutralized by PBO. In the vast majority of cases producers affected by resistant parasites do not know which mechanisms make the parasites resistant, and it is mostly not possible to find it out. Consequently, whether the synergist PBO helps to overcome resistance or not is in fact a lottery.
In this particular case, considering that resistance to abamectin is not yet problem in horn flies or any other external parasite of cattle, it is unclear how the PBO in the tag can contribute to product efficacy. PBO has no own efficacy against any of the parasites included in the product label, and it does not significantly enhance the efficacy of abamectin against susceptible parasites either.
- Synthetic pyrethroids (e.g. cyfluthrin, cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, permethrin, etc.). However, horn flies have developed resistance to these compounds in many regions.
- Organophosphates (e.g. diazinon, chlorpyrifos).
These alternative products may not be available in all countries or may not be effective against all the concerned parasites.
A very reasonable strategy to prevent or at least delay resistance development is to rotate each year between chemical classes. For preventing or at least delaying horn fly resistance best is to rotate each year between organophosphates, synthetic pyrethroids and macrocyclic lactones. Macrocyclic lactones are available also as pour-ons for the control of horn flies. Injectables and drenches do not control flies or other external parasites.
Are the active ingredients of this product ORIGINAL* or GENERICS**?
*Meaning that they are still patent protected and generics are not yet available
**Meaning that they have lost patent protection and may be acquired from manufacturers of generic active ingredients other than the holder of the original patent.
Click here to learn more about GENERIC vs. ORIGINAL drugs.
For an overview and a list of the most used insecticide-impregnated ear-tags click here.
Abamectin, one of the first macrocyclic lactones developed, was introduced already in the 1980s (by MSD AGVET). As all macrocyclic lactones, abamectin is an endectocide, i.e. it is simultaneously effective against external parasites and against internal parasites (mainly roundworms). Administered as an ear-tag it is not approved for the control of inernal parasites, probably because the concentration achieved in the blood is insufficient for this purpose. Abamectin is considered as the "cheap" ivermectin, with a similar spectrum of efficacy but less potent and slightly more toxic. Abamectin is vastly used in agricultural and hygiene pesticides worldwide, including the USA. Interestingly it is also abundantly used in livestock and pets in Australia and New Zealand, but extremely scarcely in Europe and the USA.
All macrocyclic lactones are both contact and systemic parasiticides. When parasites land on a treated host the active ingredient that impregnates the host's hair coat penetrates through the cuticle of the parasite (the "skin" of insects and other arthropods) into its organism and disturbs essential biological processes in the parasite's body, in this case its nervous system. The systemic mode of action means that macrocyclic lactones also work against parasites through the blood of the host, and this regardless of whether they are administered by injection, orally (drench), or topically (pour-ons). After topical administration (pour-on, ear-tag), part of the administered active ingredient that impregnates the hair coat is ingested through licking and grooming, and after ingestion it gets into the host's blood. Part of the active ingredient is also absorbed transdermally, i.e. through the skin and also gets into the host's blood. And part remains in the hair-coat. This is certainly so also in this particular abamectin ear-tag. But the amounts that finally reach the host's blood are probably insufficient for controlling internal parasites.
Insecticide-impregnated ear-tags are designed to slowly release the insecticide into the animals hair-coat to ensure protection for months. Whether most of the insecticide is released at the beginning and only a little at the end, or release is homogeneous depends on the composition of the matrix and the behavior of the active ingredient(s) in it. However, after 2 to 3 months the amount released progressively decreases to drop below the amount that is required to ensure full fly control. This means that at a certain point flies and other parasites may be exposed to sub-lethal doses, which is generally considered as a factor that favors resistance development. For this reason the tags should be removed after 3-4 months following the manufacturer's use recommendations, and either replaced by new ones or the animals should be left untagged.
Once the active ingredient is released, efficacy strongly depends on the spreading of the active ingredient(s) along the animal's hair coat to other parts of the body. This depends on factors such as solubility of the active ingredient in the hair and skin lipids. Persistence in the hair-coat depends on other features of the active ingredient(s) such as volatility, resistance to sunlight, solubility in water, etc. As a general rule, some body parts will get less active ingredient than other parts and protection there will be lower, e.g. the legs, the underbelly, the udders, below the tail, etc. Animal behavior (licking, grooming, rubbing, etc.) plays a role as well. It has been shown, that if only half of the animals in a herd are tagged, those untagged will also be protected against flies, indicating that part of the active ingredient is transferred from tagged to untagged animals. However, this also means that tagged animals will lose part of the active ingredient and protection will be shorter and/or control will be poorer. For this reason all animals in a herd should be tagged because this reduces the impact of animal behavior in efficacy and protection. However, since individual animal behavior plays a role in efficacy and length of protection, it must be accepted that protection will not always be the same in all the animals in a herd.
Control of susceptible (i.e. non-resistant) horn flies is usually excellent, because they spend a lot of time on cattle and thus are exposed to the insecticide for a long period of time. Face flies remain shorter on the hosts and protection may not last as long as that of horn flies. Efficacy against ticks depends strongly on the behavior and characteristics of each tick species. Ear ticks are obviously exposed to high doses of the active ingredient release by the ear-tags around the ears. But many ticks attach to cattle in body parts (e.g. the underbelly, the udders, the perineum, below the tail, etc.) that are poorly reached by the active ingredient released by the ear-tags and may not be sufficiently controlled.
This article IS NOT A PRODUCT LABEL. It offers complementary information that may be useful to veterinary professionals and users that are not familiar with veterinary antiparasitics.
Information offered in this article has been extracted from publications issued by manufacturers, government agencies (e.g. EMEA, FDA, USDA, etc.) or in the scientific literature. No guarantee is given on its accuracy, integrity, sufficiency, actuality and opportunity, and any liability is denied. Read the site's DISCLAIMER.
In case of doubt contact the manufacturer or a veterinary professional.